Gisele Bundchen's Waterbirth: Could it Have Reduced the Risk of Complications?

By Robert Latkany, MD
February 02, 2010

Collage art of Gisele Bundchen in BathtubSupermodel Gisele Bundchen, wife of NFL quarterback Tom Brady, reports that she gave birth to her baby Benjamin in her penthouse bathtub on Dec 8th, 2009, according to People Magazine. Given this is her first delivery there were many issues at hand.  We were more than a little surprised that she chose to deliver at home for a first pregnancy --too risky for our taste, since the risk of a woman dying during home delivery is about twice as high as during a hospital delivery.  But the concept of the water birth was intriguing.  We wanted to know: do babies born by waterbirth have an increased rate of infection compared to those born through normal spontaeous vaginal delivery without the benefit of the bath?  And do mothers who delivery in the bath have decreased rate of tearing or episiotomy than those born without a waterbath?   

Zanetti-Daellenbach et al prospectively studied women who had a waterbirth, women who were immersed but then came out of the water for a normal spontaneous vaginal delivery, and women who were never immersed and who had a normal spontaneous vaginal delivery.  They found that there was no difference in either maternal or child infection rates among the groups.  Women who had a waterbirth required less anesthesia and were less likely to have an episiotomy than women who were never immersed.  Infants born during a waterbirth were just as likely to be healthy as those who were born during normal non-immersed spontaneous vaginal delivery.

The encouraging findings about reduced need for anesthesia were backed up by Cluet et al: their Cochrane review concluded that water immersion during the first stage of labor significantly reduces the need for spinal and epidural pain medication and there were no increased adverse events. 

Thoeni et al compared first time deliveries in water versus other first time deliveries in traditional beds and found episiotomy rates were far less for water births (0.38%) compared to epesiotomy rates during traditional bed deliveries (23%).  They were also found to have shorter first stages of labor, and reduced pain requirements. 

Although the results appear to be encouraging, it is important to consult with your own Obstetrician about the smartest and safest delivery method for you and your baby. 

< !-- start Vibrant IntelliTXT script section -- > < script type="text/javascript" src="http://yourdomain.us.intellitxt.com/intellitxt/front.asp?ipid=1234">< /script > < !-- end Vibrant IntelliTXT script section-- > < /body > < /html >



Please read our legal disclaimer.

Write a comment

  • Required fields are marked with *.


If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code.
 




Kelly Preston's Pregnancy: the Role of Advanced Maternal Age

Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Fatty Fish: Too Much Mercury or Too Little EFA

Will Heidi Klum Have Post-Pregnancy Weight "Auf" by December?

Ultrasound Detection of Down's Syndrome Delayed

The Gym Can Tame Fat During Pregnancy

If You Want a Live Baby, Stop Smoking. Surprise!

What are the Effects of Fasting on Pregnancy?

IT Can Help Deliver A Healthy Baby

Best Project in Life: Even Hot Movie Stars Need To Make Babies Before Forty

Highly Trained Child Experts or Just New Parents?

The Evidence Based Diet: Ginger Cookies for Nausea, Pain, Cholesterol

Time: Type A Personalities Make More Babies

Post Partum Depression More Likely with Multiple Births

Vasectomies: Cash Under the Mattress

Iodine Deficiency in Pregnant Women